Rectification of mistake - Levy penalty u/s 271AAC or u/s 270 - ...

CIT(A) wrongfully initiated penalty u/s 270A instead of 271AAC; no income chargeable u/s 115BBE.

September 11, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Rectification of mistake - Levy penalty u/s 271AAC or u/s 270 - No proceedings are pending before the CIT(A) - CIT (A) was not right in passing order of rectification by directing to initiate the penalty proceedings u/s 270A in place of penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC when admittedly vide her initial order dated 28.02.2022 has categorically held that addition made on account of alleged unaccounted sale u/s 68 is totally unjustified and consequently not covered u/s 115BBE of the Act and there was no income chargeable to tax under section 115BBE. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification of mistake - Levy penalty u/s 271AAC or u/s 270 - ...

CIT(A) wrongfully initiated penalty u/s 270A instead of 271AAC; no income chargeable u/s 115BBE.

September 11, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s 270A levied for assessee's willful misreporting of income by claiming both capital expenses and depreciation as application of income. ITAT held mens rea not...

ITAT held that no specific charge was framed against the assessee in the show-cause notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 270A for misreporting of income. While the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

Pertaining to the levy of penalty u/s 271AAC(1), the Assessing Officer (AO) initially passed an order u/s 144, concluding the assessment on a best judgment basis and...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s 270A - “underreporting” of income - right to be granted immunity under Section 270AA - In the present case, the petitioner has satisfied the aforesaid...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Levy of penalty u/s 270A r.w.s. 274 - misreporting of income on the addition of leave encashment - levy of penalty is not automatic on mere making addition, if the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under...

Quick Updates: