Approval of Resolution Plan - Non Consideration of GST liability ...

Tribunal Approves Resolution Plan Ignoring GST Liability Due to Unascertained Demand; Res Judicata Bars Further Challenges.

September 30, 2023

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

Approval of Resolution Plan - Non Consideration of GST liability as First Charge - the ‘demand’ was not ‘ascertained’ and not crystalised and placed before the 1st Respondent / Resolution Professional for consideration of the ‘Committee of Creditors’. Suffice it, for this ‘Tribunal’, to pertinently point out that the Appellant / Petitioner, is prohibited, based on the ‘Principle of Res judicata’, and ‘by its conduct, is estopped’ from agitating the likewise, grounds for determination before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ / ‘Tribunal’. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Approval of Resolution Plan - Non Consideration of GST liability ...

Tribunal Approves Resolution Plan Ignoring GST Liability Due to Unascertained Demand; Res Judicata Bars Further Challenges.

September 30, 2023

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

Validity of approval of Resolution Plan - Dues of EPF - Seeking entire claim to be allowed on priority - the ‘Petitioner’ / ‘Appellant’ is ‘not a Party’ to the...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the rejection of the Appellant's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) due to delay. The Committee of...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Resolution plan approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 97.54% vote share. Commercial wisdom of CoC in approving resolution plan not to be lightly interfered with....

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Tribunal to interfere with the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) is limited...

The summary focuses on the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the limited scope of judicial review by the adjudicating authority. The...

Direction to COC to consider ineligibility of 3rd Respondent under Section 29A of I&B Code - as per the Provisions of Law, the COC has power to take a decision with...

NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a new resolution plan submission. The tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's claim for outstanding income tax demands against the corporate debtor could not be admitted...

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

Quick Updates: