Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question ...

Customs

November 3, 2023

Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question of Law - Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Broker / CHA - CESTAT found that the case of the appellant that respondent/CHA was in violation of regulation 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of CBLR was not made out, and consequently the impugned order as well as the penalty imposed were set aside. - Revenue failed to raise any question of law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question ...

Customs

November 3, 2023

You may also like:

Direction in original appellate proceeding - Not challenged - it cannot now question the findings of the lower appellate authority based on earlier direction - No...

CE - imposition of penalties one on the proprietorship firm and second on the proprietor would amount to imposition of penalty twice, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Penalty u/s 271C -LTA - Mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

Correct head of income - the nature of gains from mutual fund redemptions - these gains were capital gains, not business income - no substantial question of law arises - HC

Allowabiltry of depreciation - not claimed deprecation in either its original return or in its revised return - Tribunal allowed the depreciation - no substantial...

Clandestine removal - surplus stock of angles, channel and joist - non-acceptance of appellant's explanation does not raise any substantial question of law

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the addition was set aside, there was no question of imposition of penalty - HC

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Quick Updates: