Levying of penalty u/s 270A - Reasonable belief in claiming ...

Court Rules Against Penalty Due to Lack of Specificity in Tax Deduction Case u/s 270A.

January 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levying of penalty u/s 270A - Reasonable belief in claiming deduction which was disallowed - In the present case, neither in the assessment order nor in the subsequent show-cause notices, the Assessing Officer has specified that the case of the petitioner-company is covered under which part of sub-section (9) of Section 270A of the Act. Even in the impugned order dated 31.03.2023 also, it is not specified that which part of sub-section (9) of Section 270A of the Act is attracted in the case of petitioner. - No penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levying of penalty u/s 270A - Reasonable belief in claiming ...

Court Rules Against Penalty Due to Lack of Specificity in Tax Deduction Case u/s 270A.

January 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 270A - AO has disallowed the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 24 and Chapter-VIA deduction as false claims - The appellant contested the penalty on various...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

Penalty u/s 270A and 271AAB - Defective notice u/s 274 - under reporting of income - search and seizure operation - The Tribunal found that the penalty notices under...

The case involved penalty proceedings u/s 270A for under-reporting or misreporting of income. The appellant argued that there was no underreporting as the transaction...

The court interpreted provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Local Body Tax) Rules, clarifying the...

The High Court addressed a case involving a delay in filing an application for Revocation of cancellation of GST registration. The court considered the invocation of the...

The Karnataka High Court addressed the issue of a Sub-Registrar refusing registration of a sale certificate due to pending Income Tax dues against the borrowers. The...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Quick Updates: