Revision u/s 263 - large share premium received - valuation of ...

Tribunal Rules PCIT's Order on Share Valuation Erroneous; Original Assessment Upheld as Justified.

January 30, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - large share premium received - valuation of shares and the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) - The Tribunal found that the PCIT's order was erroneous as it did not properly consider the assessee's provided documentation and valuation report under Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules. The Tribunal concluded that the original assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) was not erroneous, and thus, the exercise of power u/s 263 by the PCIT was incorrect.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - large share premium received - valuation of ...

Tribunal Rules PCIT's Order on Share Valuation Erroneous; Original Assessment Upheld as Justified.

January 30, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

In a CESTAT decision addressing customs valuation, the Tribunal ruled against re-determining import goods' value through arbitrary price truncation. The judicial finding...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Method of valuation - Revenue neutrality - Extended period of limitation - goods transferred to another unit for captive consumption - to be valued in accordance with...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's invocation of Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA for determining the fair market value of unquoted...

ITAT held that the assessee, a company director, was not liable for additional tax assessment on share premium. The tribunal rejected revenue's attempt to reassess share...

Mis-declaration of quantity - Assorted spectacle - The Tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of quantity, confirming that the actual quantity exceeded the declared...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of imported goods (ball valves/check valves/cartridges of brass). The rejection of declared value and...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT had argued that the original assessments were inadequate and missed critical checks, which purportedly rendered the...

CESTAT address the issue of revision in duty liability of 'antenna' regarding assessable value under Customs Valuation Rules. The tribunal found flaws in the...

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The ITAT thoroughly examined the reasons recorded by the AO for re-opening the assessment and found that there was...

Refund Of excess amount of duty paid on short shipped quantity - Valuation - erroneous calculation of FOB value of the subject consignment - The Appellate Tribunal found...

CESTAT held that appellant's challenge to valuation enhancement failed as they had previously imported identical goods (4000 oath tokens) at USD 50 but later declared...

In this ITAT ruling, the Tribunal held that the DCF method for share valuation was validly applied per Rule 11UA(2)(b), accepting the Chartered Accountant's...

Quick Updates: