Addition u/s 43CA - difference in the value of sale ...

ITAT Rules Section 43CA Inapplicable Retrospectively; Taxpayer's 2008 Property Sale Addition Unjustified.

February 17, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 43CA - difference in the value of sale consideration of the of property as shown by the assessee and value adopted by the Sub-Registrar for stamp duty purposes - ITAT held that Section 43CA, which mandates consideration of stamp duty value for tax purposes, is applicable. However, given the agreement and most payments were made in 2008, and considering the provision of Section 43CA(3), the tribunal found that the addition made by the AO was not justifiable, since the provisions are not retrospective.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 43CA - difference in the value of sale ...

ITAT Rules Section 43CA Inapplicable Retrospectively; Taxpayer's 2008 Property Sale Addition Unjustified.

February 17, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for LTCG deduction u/s 54F despite delayed possession of new property. While assessee made full payment exceeding capital gains within...

ITAT upheld deletion of additions under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE regarding cash deposits made during demonetization period. The taxpayer successfully demonstrated that...

The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the benefit of the New Tax Regime to an individual taxpayer...

ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, rejecting the AO's disallowance of commission and sales incentives. The tribunal found no principal-agent relationship exists between...

Service tax liability on sale of imported tally software was disputed. Appellant was a distributor marketing and installing the software on behalf of the seller holding...

Benefit u/s 11(1A) - Once the AO has accepted the plea that transfer took place in AY 2008-09 and assessed income under long term capital gains in the hands of Assessee,...

The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, setting aside additions made under sections 69 and 56(2)(vii) regarding property acquisition. The Tribunal determined that the...

Assessee utilized long-term capital gain from sale of immovable property for purchase of new residential property within permissible time period. Purchase consideration...

The Tribunal held that the remuneration received by the assessee, who was a whole-time director holding 13.8% shares in D-Art Furniture System Pvt. Ltd. and supervising...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

ITAT adjudicated a dispute regarding capital gains taxation for property sale. The tribunal found the Assessing Officer's (AO) determination of short-term capital gains...

ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues....

The ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer, determining that fabrication charges received could not be treated as "fees for technical services" under Article 12(4)(a) of...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's...

Quick Updates: