Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

The Tribunal examines whether the services provided by the OLSPs ...


Tribunal Rules OLSP Services Not Taxable as "Business Auxiliary Service"; Show Cause Notice Lacks Required Specificity.

February 29, 2024

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

The Tribunal examines whether the services provided by the OLSPs to the Appellant fall under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service" as defined in the Finance Act, 1994. It concludes that since the OLSPs are not acting as agents of the Appellant, the services provided by them cannot be taxed under the specified category. - The CESTAT finds that the Show Cause Notice lacks specificity regarding the sub-clause of Section 65(19) under which the demand is raised. It rules that such a defect in the notice cannot be rectified by observations made by the adjudicating authority.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

  2. Appellant provided 'Intermediary' services classifiable as business auxiliary services within taxable territory to foreign recipients. Service Tax returns showed...

  3. Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

  4. The CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning advisory services provided by appellant to JCB UK, determining these constituted export of services under Rule 6A of Service Tax...

  5. The case involved the levy of service tax on various services provided by the appellant. The Appellate Tribunal held that the appellant, as a provider of business...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issues of service classification, service tax liability, and extended limitation period. The appellants' services did not fall under...

  7. Classification of services - providing ERP system - Business Auxiliary Service or not - It is settled that the ERP Service is clearly an Information Technology Service....

  8. The CESTAT held that the services rendered by the appellant to overseas universities/colleges amounted to 'Export of Service' and not 'intermediary service'. It observed...

  9. The case pertains to the classification of services provided by M/s Intelsat to the respondent as either 'Telecommunication Services' or 'Support Services for Business...

  10. Import of services - RCM - Business auxiliary services (BAS) / Business support service (BSS) - The tribunal noted that these services were performed entirely outside...

  11. Business Auxiliary Service - target incentives not liable to service tax - AT

  12. CENVAT credit - input service - Business Auxiliary Service relating to sales commission - credit allowed - AT

  13. Business Auxiliary Services - Job work - ‘yamming process’ amount to manufacture - not liable to service tax - AT

  14. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  15. The appellant's services cannot be classified as "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and hence are not exempt from service tax. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates