Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s 271D - Sale of property in cash - meaning of the ...


ITAT clarifies Section 269SS: No penalty on cash received as final payment during property registration, not advance.

March 21, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271D - Sale of property in cash - meaning of the term “specified sum” - The ITAT examined the definition of "specified sum" under Explanation (iv) to Section 269SS, which pertains to any sum of money receivable, whether as advance or otherwise, in relation to the transfer of an immovable property. It relied on a previous decision by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, which held that the provision applies only to advance payments and not to transactions where the final payment is made at the time of registration before the sub-registrar. - The Tribunal noted that the cash received by the assessee was not treated as an advance but as the final payment during the registration of the sale deed. Therefore, it concluded that there was no violation of Section 269SS in the given facts and circumstances.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

  2. Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular...

  3. Penalty u/s 271D - cash received of sales of immovable property - allegation of violation of provisions of Sec.269SS - cash payment was made at one go before the...

  4. Addition u/s 69A - Source of Cash deposit - Assessee contended that same is received in advance against the sale of property - Levy of penalty u/s 271D - The ITAT held...

  5. The ITAT Visakhapatnam dealt with a case involving penalty u/s. 271D for receiving cash in relation to the transfer of immovable property, which falls under section...

  6. ITAT recalled its earlier order upon finding a mistake apparent on record regarding trust registration status under section 12A. Initially, ITAT had set aside CIT(E)'s...

  7. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  8. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  9. In a LTCG computation case, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding disallowance of improvement costs on a property transfer. The tribunal held that payments...

  10. The ITAT set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] granting relief to the assessee (anonymized party) on the ground that the matter was...

  11. The ITAT adjudicated on the following issues: 1. Cost of acquisition for computing long-term capital gains on sale of ancestral agricultural land: The assessee's...

  12. The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements....

  13. Interest liability u/s 234A, 234B, 234C - Cash seized during the search - To be treated as Advance Tax or not - In this case, as ROI was filed, though after the search....

  14. This is an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the rejection of final registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The key points are:...

  15. Addition u/s 40A - sum paid in cash in respect of purchase of the two immoveable properties - Sale deed has been executed on 18.8.2013 and the payment has been made on...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates