Addition u/s 68 - assessee received unsecured loans from various ...

Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Additions, Citing Clear Fund Chain and Prohibition on Double Taxation.

April 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 68 - assessee received unsecured loans from various parties - The AO had held that the unsecured loans received by the assessee were a sham transaction to introduce its own unexplained money into the account. - The Tribunal reviewed the findings of the lower authorities and the submissions of both parties. They noted that the assessee had established a clear chain of funds and provided necessary details, including income offered before the settlement commission. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that once an amount is taxed, it cannot be taxed again. Therefore, they confirmed the deletion of the additions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - assessee received unsecured loans from various ...

Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Additions, Citing Clear Fund Chain and Prohibition on Double Taxation.

April 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, regarding the addition u/s 68, it was found that the investors' transactions were genuine, evidenced by banking...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in not allowing deduction u/s 10A on account of enhanced business profit. The Tribunal emphasized that an...

AO disallowed professional fees paid to doctors citing lack of evidence regarding their role as consultants, researchers or advisors. CIT(A) deleted disallowance noting...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for interest charged on loans, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the adjustment,...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined...

The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

Unexplained Income - addition u/s 68 - Receipt of share application money from group companies - group companies invest in each other - Double additions - In this case...

The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission...

Accrual of income - Addition made to the income of the assessee received by the assessee from “JDS” and its associates, treated as own income of the assessee - Despite...

Quick Updates: