Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

Rejection of application filed for extension of time for the ...


NCLAT Overturns Ruling, Citing Unfair Process in Insolvency Case; Highlights Need for Extensions in Complex Situations.

May 9, 2024

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

Rejection of application filed for extension of time for the purposes of completion of the Insolvency Resolution Process - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) acknowledged the complexity of the insolvency cases and the necessity of extending the time beyond the statutory limit of 330 days prescribed by the IBC. The Tribunal cited the judgment in Essar Steel to support that extensions could be justified under exceptional circumstances to ensure justice and efficiency in the resolution process. - The Tribunal found that the resolution professional had not provided a fair chance for rectifying the alleged defects in the resolution plans submitted. - The Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing the orders of the Adjudicating Authority.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

  2. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has extended the deadline for liquidators to file forms related to liquidation and voluntary liquidation processes...

  3. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  4. Rule 48 of the NCLAT Rules clearly stipulates service of notice on the other side, pursuant to issuance of notice by the NCLAT in the appeal, regardless of supply of...

  5. The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

  6. A bidder in the liquidation process does not have a vested right to have their resolution plan considered or approved. - Regarding valuation of property, NCLAT...

  7. IBBI amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board...

  8. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

  9. NCLAT analyzed the procedural requirements for initiating insolvency resolution process for personal guarantors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal...

  10. Once the CoC (Respondent No. 2) has approved the Resolution Plan, the Administrator of the DHFL, has to obtain no-objection from RBI in accordance with Rule 5(d) of the...

  11. CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed an appeal due to abatement for adjourning the matter beyond three times, citing Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. Referring to...

  12. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  13. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has extended the deadline for liquidators to file forms related to liquidation processes under the Insolvency and...

  14. CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

  15. NCLAT proceedings - Requirements from the parties before the NCLAT to file brief written submissions and copies of the judgments - even assuming that there was no...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates