Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for ...


AO directed to delete addition u/s 69A/68. Cash deposits were from sales, not unexplained.

May 28, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained. The assessee's explanation of cash deposits from sales was rejected by AO and CIT(A) despite not rejecting books of accounts. The Tribunal held that absence of cash sales in prior years doesn't justify rejecting the explanation when books were not rejected and trading results were accepted. Referring to precedents, the Tribunal directed deletion of additions u/s 69A/68, emphasizing that cash deposits were from declared sales proceeds. Citing cases like Anantpur Kalpana and Mukesh K. Waghasia, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the importance of supporting evidence in such matters.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

  2. Unexplained cash credit - addition of cash deposit in bank account - It is important to mention here that the bank statements cannot be termed as books of accounts for...

  3. The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

  4. Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

  5. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  6. The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits...

  7. Addition u/s 68 r.w. section 115BBE - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The tribunal finds that the AO did not provide a satisfactory explanation for...

  8. Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145 - Addition u/ss 68/69A with 115BBE - cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained credit. The Assessing Officer did not...

  9. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of...

  10. Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash towards cash deposits made during the demonetisation period - AO did not reject the books of accounts of the assessee and has not...

  12. Bogus share transactions were alleged, and the Assessing Officer (AO) denied the assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(38) by treating the sale consideration of shares...

  13. Rejection of the books of accounts - best judgment assessment u/s 144 - addition of the sales made in cash on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - While the...

  14. Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

  15. ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding disputed cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee had properly recorded cash sales in accounting books and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates