Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT Mumbai considered the validity of a rectification order ...


Tribunal Rules Provident Fund Withdrawal Exempt, Orders Removal of Added Income from Rectification Order.

May 29, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT Mumbai considered the validity of a rectification order u/s 154 due to a discrepancy in income computation. The issue revolved around the treatment of a withdrawn amount from the provident fund (PF) as taxable income. The assessee, an employee deriving income from salary, disclosed the withdrawn amount as exempt income in the rectified return. The tribunal found that the sum withdrawn after more than five years of service was exempt u/s 10(12) of the Income Tax Act. The lower authorities' orders were deemed unsustainable as they overlooked the facts presented in the rectification applications. Consequently, the assessing officer was directed to delete the addition of the withdrawn amount from the provident fund, ruling in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. This notification from the Director General of Income Tax (Systems) specifies that Forms 42, 43, and 44 prescribed in Appendix-II of the Income Tax Rules 1962 shall be...

  2. This case deals with the disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, which pertains to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income. The key points...

  3. Delay in deposit made to the employees Provident fund and ESIC - such sums were not credited by the respective assessee to the employees 'accounts in the relevant fund...

  4. Levy of Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) - timeframe prescribed under Rule 18 of the ADD Rules - The Tribunal was right in concluding that the time for which the interim orders...

  5. The proposed amendments aim to further incentivize operations from International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs) by expanding the scope of specified funds eligible...

  6. ITAT ruled on capital gains taxation for mutual fund units, determining that units of mutual funds constitute a distinct security category under Article 13(5) of the...

  7. Assessment u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - the disallowance under Rule 8D of the IT Rules read with Section 14A of the Act can never exceed the exempted income earned by the...

  8. CENVAT Credit - exempted activity or not - trading in mutual funds - The appellant cannot be termed as “service provider” because he only makes an investment in the...

  9. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

  10. The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

  11. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - In any case, as per section 14A(3) whether or not the assessee has incurred any expenditure for earning exempt income, a part of...

  12. The case deals with the applicability of Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act, which provides exemption from capital gains tax if the gains are invested in specified bonds...

  13. Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

  14. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding multiple contribution-related disputes. The Tribunal upheld the one-time superannuation fund contribution made to...

  15. Interest income earned from funds received from Government for setting up a company is a capital receipt, not revenue receipt, as the funds and income must be utilized...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates