The case involves denial of Drawback claims due to testing ...

CESTAT ruled in favor of exporter for Denial of Drawback claims due to lack of samples/testing. Export proceedings to be verified.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

The case involves denial of Drawback claims due to testing sample issues. No samples were drawn for 17 Shipping Bills, leading to reversal of the denial. For 16 Bills with samples, doubts raised on testing procedures. Non-verification of export proceedings for 33 consignments led to remand for verification. Interest on drawback to be considered. Penalties and confiscation set aside. Adjudicating Authority instructed to conclude proceedings within 3 months.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves denial of Drawback claims due to testing ...

CESTAT ruled in favor of exporter for Denial of Drawback claims due to lack of samples/testing. Export proceedings to be verified.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

HC ruled that exporters are entitled to duty drawbacks when exporting unlocked mobile phones. Following M/s AIMS Retail Services Private Limited precedent, the court...

HC ruled in favor of mobile phone exporters, holding that unlocking/activation of phones for overseas markets does not constitute "taken into use" under Rule 3 of Duty...

Export of goods – Drawback claim – in the absence of retest of remnant samples as the remnant samples were not available - original authority directed to sanction the...

CBIC clarified that under Rules 6 and 7 of the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules 2017, exporters must pay application fee for time extension requests on...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

The dispute centered around the classification of imported goods, calcium carbonate, under the appropriate Customs Tariff Heading (CTH). The revenue classified it as...

The Public Notice issued by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) introduces the CRCL Module for the electronic forwarding of samples to Central Revenues...

The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter (appellant) allegedly misdeclared the export goods, leading to an excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/-. The...

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, explicitly excludes the Tribunal's jurisdiction over...

CESTAT allowed appeal against customs duty reclassification based on re-testing of imported fabric samples. The authorities failed to comply with Section 28 of Customs...

Duty Drawback claim rejected for non-Basmati Rice export, appellant argued not filing drawback shipping bill due to reasons beyond control. Tribunal held Commissioner...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

The Public Notice issued by the Office of Principal Commissioner of Customs addresses the non-disbursal of Drawback to certain exporters due to their bank account...

CESTAT ruled that Customs House Laboratory reports were unreliable evidence due to cryptic content and significant delays in delivery (approximately 1-8 months after...

Claim of duty drawback - Denial of permission for conversion/ amendment of 13 free shipping bills filed by the filed by the appellant without claiming AIR drawback - The...

Quick Updates: