Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involves an appeal against a final assessment order ...


CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant on misinterpretation of Customs Act. Tug & bunkers correctly classified. Appeal allowed.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The case involves an appeal against a final assessment order concerning the classification and duty assessment of a tug and its bunkers under relevant Customs Acts. The Appellate Tribunal held that the tug, brought for breaking at a port, was correctly classified under a specific tariff heading. The bunkers were part of the tug's goods for breaking, and duty cannot be separately demanded. Referring to a precedent, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, stating that the facts were similar to the cited case, thus allowing the appeal. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

  2. The CESTAT held that for valuation of bunker fuel consumed during coastal runs, the NIDB (National Import Database) data should be adopted as recognized by the facility...

  3. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of continuing an appeal post the NCLT's approval of the resolution plan. Referring to Rule 22 of CESTAT...

  4. CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

  5. Scope of adjournment of matter beyond three times - Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - The Tribunal dismisses the appeal due to the appellant's non-prosecution,...

  6. The CESTAT dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after multiple adjournments exceeded the statutory maximum of three....

  7. CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

  8. Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

  9. Compliance with rule 3A by certain Nidhis - Rule 23A of the Nidhi Rules, 2014 - As amended

  10. CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule...

  11. Classification and assessment of oil contained in the bunker tanks, both inside and outside the engine room of a vessel imported for breaking up - Tribunal had allowed...

  12. CESTAT allowed appeal regarding classification of Paddle Wheel Aerators used in aquaculture. Initially dismissed by Comm. (Appeals) due to 87-day delay, medical...

  13. National Financial Reporting Authority (Amendment) Rules, 2019 - Rule 2, Rule 3, Rule 5 and Rule 11 amended.

  14. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  15. CESTAT adjudicated a CENVAT credit dispute involving manufacturing units and trading services. The tribunal found that the appellant maintained separate records for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates