The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and ...

In a customs case, penalties & confiscation found unjustified due to procedural errors. Commissioner exceeded authority.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties imposed were not justified as the procedural irregularities did not warrant such severe actions. The Tribunal highlighted that the confiscation of goods was not warranted as the goods were not removed from the customs area without permission. The Commissioner of Customs was deemed to have exceeded authority in imposing penalties and failed to properly assess the breaches. The Tribunal set aside the penalties and confiscation, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and ...

In a customs case, penalties & confiscation found unjustified due to procedural errors. Commissioner exceeded authority.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

CESTAT set aside the confiscation of foreign liquors and various foreign goods as well as penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962...

CESTAT adjudicated a complex customs proceedings case involving procedural safeguards under Section 155 of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal found that the original...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

Export of Goods - Mis-declaration of Mud additive chemicals for oil well - Confiscation - The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision to confiscate the goods was...

Appellants challenged confiscation of containers, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty due to inordinate delay in adjudication. Tribunal found procedural lapse by...

The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

The CESTAT held that confiscation of gold and penalties imposed on the appellant were unjustified. The tribunal found that the Revenue's case relied primarily on...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty for abetment in evasion of duty of customs - In the context of Section 112(a) of the Customs Act,...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Quick Updates: