The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, reviewed the validity of an ...

Appellate Tribunal Quashes Assessment Order; Incorrect Facts Used for Reopening Case u/s 148A.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, reviewed the validity of an assessment order challenged due to reasons recorded without proper application of mind u/s 148A. The AO based reasons on information from the AIR uploaded by a reporting entity about deposits in a J&K bank account not belonging to the assessee. The ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred in affirming the addition without recognizing the incorrect assumption that the account belonged to the assessee, despite a bank certificate confirming otherwise. The ITAT deemed the reasons recorded as legally flawed, emphasizing that reopening cannot be based on incorrect facts derived from AIR information. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessment made on such grounds should be quashed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, reviewed the validity of an ...

Appellate Tribunal Quashes Assessment Order; Incorrect Facts Used for Reopening Case u/s 148A.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment - Notice issued u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 31st March, 2022, the mandate of Section 148A(c) of the Act...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Scope of new regime of Section 148A - The principle of law, as explained by the Supreme Court, in the case of GKN Driveshaft (India)...

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings where AO provided only 5 days to assessee for filing explanation under s.148A(b). Following judicial precedent that established 7...

The High Court considered the reopening of assessment u/s 147 with reference to section 144B, following a proceeding u/s 148A. The petitioner did not respond to the...

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 against assessee. There was a difference between reasons communicated in notice u/s 148A(b) alleging bogus...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

The case involves the validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 based on reasons to believe, where the head of income was changed from business to income from...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice u/s 148A(b) - the intent behind issuing the notice u/s 148A(b) is to inform the assessee of the allegations against him/her with...

Reopening of assessment - validity of notice issued u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 29th March, 2022, the mandate of Section 148A(c)...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of the notice u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 31st March, 2022, the mandate of Section...

Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts necessary for completing the assessment u/s 143(3) of...

The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years. The assessment was based on notes to accounts for AY 2009-10....

CENVAT Credit - input services - transportation of excisable goods to its own unit - place of removal - The stark distinction of facts of the case before the Tribunal...

Quick Updates: