Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 challenged. Profit ...


Reassessment Quashed: No New Evidence Justifying Reopening u/s 147 for Share Trading Profits Already Disclosed.

July 9, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 challenged. Profit earned by trading in shares treated as unexplained credit u/s 68. Held: Petitioner disclosed all material facts including derivatives transactions in books during regular assessment proceedings. Assessing Officer passed order u/s 143(3) assessing total income. Despite profit from transactions being offered to tax in return, reopening initiated based on information received. However, Assessing Officer failed to correlate information with records and material already scrutinized during regular assessment. Petitioner provided all information, disclosing material facts fully. Reopening notice without jurisdiction, contrary to provisions, as no fresh tangible material for reasonable belief of escaped income. Mere change of opinion on profit already offered to tax. Decided in favor of assessee. Impugned notice quashed and set aside.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, affirming the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or assessment u/s 153C - reassessment was made based on the materials found in the course of search conducted on third party - The...

  3. HC upheld tax reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-2010, finding valid jurisdictional grounds for reopening assessment. The court determined that information about bogus...

  4. HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after expiry of 4-year limitation period. Court found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts...

  5. Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - eligibility of reasons to believe - initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act, issuance of notice u/s.147...

  6. The reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 was valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had received information about the assessee booking tax loss through trade in...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - unexplained share application money - non independent application of mind by AO - In the present case also since the AO acted upon the...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium - While recording the reasons for reopening the assessment, the AO did not even care to...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

  11. The crux of the matter revolves around the reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Act and the addition made u/s 68 treating the share application received as a...

  12. HC held that the AO's reassessment notice under Section 147 was invalid. The AO mechanically recorded reasons based on third-party information without providing...

  13. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

  14. HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 regarding alleged undervaluation of shares of TREPL. AO's attempt to reopen assessment was based on the value...

  15. The HC held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment beyond four years u/s 147. The reasons did not establish the assessee's failure to fully disclose...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates