Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Reopening of assessment held invalid due to lack of factual ...


Income from commodity transactions disclosed; reopening of assessment invalid. Lack of factual basis & non-application of mind by Revenue.

July 23, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Reopening of assessment held invalid due to lack of factual basis and non-application of mind by Revenue. Assessee had already disclosed relevant income from commodity transactions in return and supporting documents. Notice u/s 148 and order rejecting objections quashed, being legally unsustainable.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid. The assessee, a partner in a firm, had disclosed all financial transactions and...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

  4. The HC held that the Assessing Officer could not reopen the assessment for AY 2013-14 merely relying on information from the insight portal without forming an...

  5. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

  6. The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding it invalid on two grounds. First, the reasons recorded by the AO were vague and incomplete,...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not...

  8. The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

  9. The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

  10. HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for...

  11. ITAT ruled the assessment order invalid due to procedural deficiencies and lack of proper jurisdiction. The AO failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 143(2)...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - double deduction u/s 80IB - In the reasons for re-opening, there is not even a whisper as to what was not disclosed. In our view, this...

  13. Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the AO is not entitled on change of opinion...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - net loss of cancellation of forward contract - When the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the AO is...

  15. Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates