The impugned order was passed without considering the reply ...

Order Violates Natural Justice: Case Remanded for Reply and Hearing Under GST Act, 2017. Fundamental Rights Upheld.

July 31, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being made, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The provisions u/ss 73(9), 73(10), and 75(4) of the Act, 2017 mandate the requirement of providing an opportunity of filing a reply and personal hearing, as the word used is 'shall'. The matter was remanded to grant another opportunity to the petitioner to participate and make out a reply to the show cause notice, as the substantive rights were involved. The petition was allowed, as passing the order without considering the reply and denying personal hearing amounted to a breach of fundamental rights and violation of principles of natural justice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The impugned order was passed without considering the reply ...

Order Violates Natural Justice: Case Remanded for Reply and Hearing Under GST Act, 2017. Fundamental Rights Upheld.

July 31, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The HC set aside orders passed under section 73 of the Act that were merely uploaded to the GST Portal without proper service to the petitioner. The court found these ex...

The HC set aside both the assessment order and rectification order, remanding the matter to the assessing authority for fresh consideration. The Court found that the...

HC found a violation of natural justice where respondent issued a personal hearing notice before reply deadline and subsequently passed an order without considering...

Judicial review of an assessment order was conducted due to discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. The petitioner's replies were not considered, violating...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

HC invalidated ex parte orders issued by tax authorities due to violation of natural justice principles. The respondent-Department failed to properly serve notices...

Order challenged u/s 74(9) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 quashed due to denial of opportunity for personal hearing, violating principles of...

Confusion regarding cancellation of GST registration order - violation of principles of natural justice. No evidence of proper cancellation order or communication to...

Petition maintainable despite previously filed appeal. Order passed in violation of principles of natural justice by not allowing petitioner to file reply within...

Non-application of mind by respondent and violation of principles of natural justice. Petitioner unable to file immediate reply due to authorized person's illness....

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of jurisdiction and non-application of mind. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liability issue: Petitioner's reply on...

The High Court quashed the orders dated 01.02.2022 and 24.04.2024 passed against the petitioner u/s 74 of the GST Act. The petitioner had availed input tax credit by...

Petitioner challenged validity of re-assessment u/s 148A. HC quashed impugned order and notice initiating re-assessment proceedings issued by 3rd Respondent. HC held...

Quick Updates: