Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Dishonour of cheque - insufficient funds - presumption - ...


Cheque Dishonor Case: Respondent Rebuts Presumption Under Negotiable Instruments Act; Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence.

August 9, 2024

Case Laws     Indian Laws     SC

Dishonour of cheque - insufficient funds - presumption - standard of preponderance of probabilities - reasons to believe. Earlier, dishonour of cheque was dealt through IPC provisions. Amendment to NI Act introduced Chapter VIII to enhance acceptability of cheques and prevent harassment. Proceedings u/s 138 can be initiated even if cheque issued as security and subsequently dishonoured. Three conditions: cheque presented within validity, demand made, drawer failed to pay within 15 days. Limitation of 30 days to initiate proceedings. Presumption survives subject to contrary not proved regarding consideration or discharge of debt. Signature on blank cheque sufficient to trigger presumption u/s 139. Appellant established respondent's signature, presumption to arise. Respondent shifted weight through preponderance of probabilities. No perversity or lack of evidence against respondent. Concurrent findings backed by evidence appraisal. Appeal dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Kerala High Court dealt with a case involving dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court considered joint trial of cases, material...

  2. Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - Though the defendant has taken a stand that the cheque is issued as a security towards the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant,...

  4. The case involved a dispute regarding the dishonour of cheques, with the key issue being whether the Respondent had a legal obligation to pay back the money under the...

  5. Dishonour of cheque constituted legally recoverable debt. Petitioner convicted u/s 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. Complainant's witness, though SPA holder, competent to...

  6. The High Court considered a case involving dishonour of cheque due to insufficiency of funds, determining if a legally enforceable debt existed. The accused was...

  7. In a case concerning dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court upheld the conviction and sentence. The accused admitted issuing cheques...

  8. Dishonour of cheque - rebuttable presumption - appellant sufficiently rebutted the initial presumption as regards the issuance of the cheque under Sections 138 and 139 - SC

  9. Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of accused - Privity of Contract - The complainant has not made out a case and the presumption was rebutted by the accused in effectively...

  10. Dishonour of cheque case - petitioner-accused failed to deposit the amount despite existence of legally enforceable debt/liability. No evidence led to rebut presumption...

  11. In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The accused issued a cheque in discharge of a debt but failed to pay...

  12. HC dismisses appeal in cheque dishonour case, affirming lower court's acquittal. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable...

  13. Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of the accused - rebuttal of the presumption - the Learned Trial Court, by considering the legal presumption available under Section 139...

  14. Dishonor of cheque due to stop-payment - Once the accused rebutted the presumption under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the complainant is liable to prove...

  15. Dishonor of Cheque - acquittal of the accused - rebuttal of presumption - legally enforceable debt or not - The complainant has failed to establish his financial...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates