TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to ...

Companies Excluded from Transfer Pricing: Excessive Related Party Transactions; 25% Depreciation for Intangibles Upheld by Tribunal.

August 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to excessive related party transactions, rendering them un-comparable. Other comparables to be considered for arm's length price computation. AO's jurisdiction over expenditure for support services upheld as consistent with TPO's acceptance over the years. Cost allocation methodology change disallowed. Depreciation allowance for intangible assets like customer contracts and workforce granted at 25% rate based on ITAT decision in the assessee's favor. Additional ground raised allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to ...

Companies Excluded from Transfer Pricing: Excessive Related Party Transactions; 25% Depreciation for Intangibles Upheld by Tribunal.

August 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment....

TPA - One of the comparables Caliber Point Business Solutions has related party transactions of 30% of Revenue and going by the threshold filter of 25% of the related...

The assessee, a domestic company, contested the tax rate applied by the authorities for the assessment year 2018-19. The Finance Act, 2017 introduced a concessional tax...

Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

TP adjustment - consideration paid to the associated enterprise pursuant to the merger of the holding company (i.e. subsidiary of associated enterprise) with the...

Arm's Length Price adjustment on international transaction – selection of comparable - if abnormal loss making companies are excluded abnormal profit making companies...

Transaction between foreign enterprise and its Indian Permanent Establishment (PE) falls within transfer pricing provisions u/s 92B. ITAT held PE must be treated as...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding software development services benchmarking. The Tribunal comprehensively examined functional comparability, rejecting...

HC determined that AMP expenditure does not constitute a separate international transaction requiring transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal consistently applied...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

Valuation of imported Goods - Allowance of discount of 25% to appellant by foreign supplier - related party transaction - remittances made higher than the invoice price...

Applicability of Transfer pricing provisions - Transactions with joint venture - transactions between the assessee and IJMII do not fall under section 92B(2) -...

ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding comparable company selection. The tribunal determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) computation by the Transfer...

Quick Updates: