Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessment officer (AO) was bound by the issues and ...


Tribunal's Directions Limit Assessment Officer; Uncontested Issues Quashed, Staff Welfare and Guarantee Liabilities Upheld.

September 7, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The assessment officer (AO) was bound by the issues and directions given by the Tribunal. The AO could not raise issues that had already attained finality. If the Department was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order, they should have filed an appeal before the High Court, which the Revenue did not do specifically on these three issues. Even otherwise, the Revenue had opportunities to raise grounds before the Tribunal against the CIT(A)'s order but failed to do so. Therefore, in the impugned assessment proceedings pursuant to the Tribunal's order, these three issues could not have been raised. The additions are quashed as they are beyond the scope of the present assessment proceedings. Regarding provision for staff welfare expenses, it was held that the provision was worked out on a scientific basis by the accrual method and represents an ascertained liability, so no adjustment could be made in the book profit. The CIT(A)'s observation is confirmed, and a similar issue was decided in favor of the assessee's group concern. The provision for loss on guarantee is a contractual liability based on agreement, and the company had to account for the accrued liability. The Revenue did not file an appeal against this issue, and it had attained finality, decided in favor of the assessee. The interest u/s 234B is consequential, and since most additions have been deleted, the A.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

  2. Assessment u/s 144A - Power of JCIT to issue directions in certain cases - Directions to be exercised by the Joint Commissioner under Section 144(A) is merely intended...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 of the Act regarding the allowability of deduction of interest claimed u/s 57. The Tribunal held...

  4. The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except...

  5. The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

  6. Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

  7. Validity of the final assessment order due to non-implementation of the directions of learned DRP - Royalty/FTS receipts - The ITAT underscored the legal requirement u/s...

  8. Assessment u/s 144C(13) - Time limit for completion of assessments and reassessments - Sub-section (13) to Section 144C, in my view, imposes a restriction on the...

  9. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Despite the alleged violation of statutory procedure u/s 144B, the Tribunal found that the assessment...

  10. Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - scope of limited scrutiny - PCIT has directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh ignoring that when the case is selected for limited scrutiny,...

  12. The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final assessment orders passed beyond the limit set by section 144C(13). It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO)...

  14. The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

  15. Validity of assessment order - Assessing Officer himself has not considered the assessment year 2008-09 as covered u/s 153C of the Act. The assessing Officer has issued...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates