Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and ...


Tax Penalties Upheld for Undisclosed Income and Unexplained Deposits; Deleted for Protective Additions and Property Purchases.

September 7, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized documents during a search operation. The key points are: Penalty u/s 271AAA upheld for undisclosed consideration from land sale based on seized documents mentioning assessee's name and transaction details. Assessee failed to rebut the evidence. Penalty upheld for undisclosed capital gains from land sale confirmed by appellate authorities based on seized material. Penalty u/s 271AAA deleted for additions made on a protective basis, following judicial precedents. Penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) are mutually exclusive for the same assessment year. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) upheld for unexplained bank deposits as assessee failed to provide explanations, and additions were confirmed by appellate authorities in quantum proceedings. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted for additions based solely on seized documents without corroborative evidence regarding the purchase of property by the assessee and their father. Mere entries in seized material were insufficient. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) upheld for unexplained bank deposits in the assessee's brother's account, as the assessee could not provide a plaus.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

  2. Penalty order u/s 271AAB for treating an amount included in the Return of Income as 'undisclosed income' was found unjustified. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee's plea towards non-applicability of Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act was devoid of rationale. The Tribunal...

  4. The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

  5. Penalty levied by the AO u/s. 271AAB r.w.s. 274 - levy penalty of 30% on undisclosed income - the reasons given by the AO to levy 30% penalty on undisclosed income is...

  6. An optional scheme for Levy of Tax and Penalty on Amount Deposited in the Bank Account which was undisclosed / unexplained - Income Tax

  7. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  8. Estimation of income - “real income/commission income” - Unexplained deposits in bank account - the assessee is engaged in the business of “cheque discounting” in order...

  9. Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

  10. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  12. Undisclosed income surrendered during search must fall within the definition of undisclosed income for penalty u/s 271AAA to be justified. Assessing Officer must record...

  13. Validity of Addition on protective basis - Although, there is no provision in the Income Tax Act authorizing the levy of income tax on a person other than whom income...

  14. Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

  15. ITAT ruled against penalty imposition under s.271AAB(1A)(b) at 60% rate. The tribunal emphasized that mere voluntary disclosure during search proceedings does not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates