Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner was not ...


Tax demand revoked due to procedural lapse; chance to contest notice after part-payment.

September 9, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to unawareness of proceedings entrusted to accountant who left abruptly, leading to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Impugned order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and permitting petitioner to reply to show cause notice. Petition disposed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

  2. The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

  3. Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient...

  4. The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

  5. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  6. Non-compliance with principles of natural justice due to non-service of show cause notice. Consultant unaware of proceedings as notices uploaded on GST portal's "View...

  7. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  8. HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Petitioner claimed no awareness of notices or orders, preventing timely...

  9. The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST...

  10. Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

  11. Demand of differential tax - There are force in the contention of the appellant that part of the service tax being demanded by the Department on RCM basis cannot be...

  12. Applicability: The waiver provisions u/s 128A apply to cases involving tax demands u/s 73 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, and cases involving...

  13. The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

  14. The circular clarifies the time of supply for GST payment on spectrum allocation services when telecom operators opt for deferred payments. The bidder is liable to pay...

  15. Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates