Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and ...


Reassessment Notice Invalidated for Exceeding Limitation Period and Non-Compliance with Amended Procedures.

September 13, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the limitation period. The reassessment action commenced post April 1, 2021, was subject to the amended provisions. The Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal held that notices issued under unamended provisions should be treated as notices u/s 148A(b), subject to compliance with procedural requirements and defenses available under amended provisions, including Section 149. However, the terminal date of March 31, 2022, for commencing reassessment had passed when the Section 148A(b) notice was issued on May 27, 2022, contravening the First Proviso to Section 149(1). Ashish Agarwal cannot be construed as depriving the assessee of objections based on Section 149(1) or reinventing proceedings unchallenged earlier. The May 27, 2022 notice cannot be viewed as a continuation or substitution of the original Section 148 notice, as no legal challenge was instituted against the original notice, and no court order interdicted the reassessment action. The assessing officer failed to take corrective action despite being apprised of the amended procedure. Consequently, the impugned notice u/s.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC held that despite considering three block periods of limitation exclusion as per SC precedents, the re-assessment notice dated 23 July 2022 exceeded statutory...

  2. HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was...

  3. The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

  4. HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

  5. The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week...

  6. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  7. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  8. The HC upheld the validity of a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, determining that the notice issued on 30.07.2022 was within the prescribed...

  9. The HC allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of reassessment dated 30.05.2018 by the Assessing Officer as being barred by limitation under proviso to Section 40 of...

  10. HC quashed order relating to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were time-barred under Section 16(4) of CGST Act but fell within limitation under Section 16(5)....

  11. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

  12. The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of appeal against cancellation of GST registration for non-compliance with GST REG 2017. The petitioner...

  13. Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 barred by limitation - Though the notice u/s 148(2) was first published in the newspaper on 09.12.2017 which was beyond the...

  14. HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates