Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Classification of imported aluminum formwork structure with ...


Customs Tribunal Rules in Favor of Appellant on Aluminum Formwork Classification, Overturning Previous Order.

September 14, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Classification of imported aluminum formwork structure with accessories under the appropriate customs tariff heading. The key points are: The goods should be classified under Customs Tariff Heading 7610 90 10 as aluminum structures similar to equipment for scaffolding, shuttering, propping or pit-propping, rather than under Heading 8480 60 00. The Revenue failed to challenge the self-assessment by the appellant under the Bills-of-Entry before issuing the demand notice. The adjudicating and appellate authorities exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notice by denying the benefit of the Notification without specifying the conditions not fulfilled, depriving the appellant of an opportunity to defend their case. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT adjudicated customs duty exemption for digital still image video cameras, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal held that the imported...

  2. Maintainability of advance ruling application questioned due to pending classification issue before Customs Officer for 13 imported products used in Lithium-ion cell...

  3. Classification of imported goods - different categories of "IP Phones" such as (i) IP Audio Phones (ii) IP Audio Conference Phones (iii) Wireless IP Phones (iv) IP Video...

  4. CESTAT Mumbai analyzed the case involving 'API supari' to determine the rate of duty and the applicability of Advance Ruling u/s 28J of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal...

  5. In a CESTAT decision addressing customs valuation, the Tribunal ruled against re-determining import goods' value through arbitrary price truncation. The judicial finding...

  6. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  7. Classification of imported goods - products used in the preparation of animal feed supplements - when confronted with a specific classification entry vis-a-vis a...

  8. The case pertains to the classification of imported goods, specifically 'prepared additives for cements, mortars or concretes', for the purpose of determining the...

  9. This case deals with the classification of handcrafted stone articles like 'Chakla Belan' (rolling board and pin), mortar, pestle, etc. for export under the Merchandise...

  10. Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

  11. CESTAT adjudicated an import classification dispute involving software license documentation accompanying distributed control system hardware. The tribunal determined...

  12. Revocation of the Customs Broker Licence - The appellant argued that the license had already been revoked once and reinstated by the Tribunal, making the subsequent...

  13. Classification of imported goods - Parts of E-Rikshaws - General interpretative rules of classification under customs cannot be read into any other statute including the...

  14. Valuation of goods - old and used self-propelled platform supply vessel Sagar Fortune - The justification offered for invoking rule 12 of Customs Valuation...

  15. CESTAT adjudicated a customs classification dispute involving Clear Float Glass. The tribunal determined the imported goods should be classified under CTH 7005 1090,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates