Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the assessee firm was not entitled to ...


Firm Denied Tax Deduction for Compensation Due to Lack of Property Ownership and Established Liability in Relevant Year.

September 25, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The High Court held that the assessee firm was not entitled to claim deduction u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for the compensation paid. The key points are: The properties involved in the agreement did not belong to the assessee firm during the relevant assessment year. The assessee did not have any right, title or interest in those properties. The assessee was not a party to the agreements related to those properties. The Tribunal's reasoning that the assessee had acquired interest or rights in the properties by virtue of registration or identification was erroneous. The assessee failed to substantiate that the liability for compensation was crystallized or provided for during the relevant year. The Tribunal erred in allowing the assessee's claim by setting aside the concurrent findings of the lower authorities.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

  2. Exemption from payment of property tax under the provisions of the UP Municipal Corporation Adhiniyam, 1959 - The Supreme Court held that, the enemy properties vest in...

  3. HC ruled that mere signatory status on property conveyance does not automatically establish ownership or tax liability under Income Tax Act. Section 26 and 27 require...

  4. Long-term capital gains deduction u/s 54F can be claimed for investment in a residential property not solely owned by the assessee. The assessing officer's sole...

  5. Sale of mortgaged property for recovery of excise dues - Excise dues are not dues which arise out of land or building. Such liabilities could be in the form of property...

  6. Partnership firm rendered professional services in Japan, taxes withheld there. Firm claimed foreign tax credit (FTC) which was denied by tax authorities. ITAT held that...

  7. ITAT ruled on joint property ownership and tax deduction claims. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim under Section 54, finding no legal impediment to claiming...

  8. Deduction u/s 54/54F - assessee has not acquired the ownership rights in the new property but merely acquired tenancy right which could not be equated with ownership...

  9. The SC affirmed that property contributed by a partner to a partnership firm becomes firm property under Section 14 of the Partnership Act. In this case, the late Bhairo...

  10. Deduction u/s 54F is not available to an assessee who owns more than one house property at the time of purchasing a new property. The assessee, despite jointly...

  11. Valuation of the property under gift - Assessment u/s 15(2) of the Gift Tax Act determining the taxable gift - The assessee or her legal heir is now contesting the...

  12. ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute concerning compensation receipt upon employment termination. The tribunal determined that ex-gratia payment constitutes a capital receipt,...

  13. LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed...

  14. Compensation received by assessee from builder for non-delivery of property within stipulated time is a capital receipt not chargeable to income tax. Assessee had...

  15. LTCG - deduction u/s 54F - Ownership of more than one residential house at the time of sale of an original asset - The tribunal sided with the interpretation that joint...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates