The court quashed orders related to audit and intimation ...

Quashed unlawful tax audit orders against firm under insolvency resolution.

September 25, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The court quashed orders related to audit and intimation liability issued against the petitioner company u/s 65 of the CGST Act for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The orders were found to be without jurisdiction or legal authority, as a resolution plan for the company had already been approved by the NCLT, rendering such proceedings impermissible under applicable legal precedents. Consequently, the petition challenging the impugned orders and proceedings was allowed by the High Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court quashed orders related to audit and intimation ...

Quashed unlawful tax audit orders against firm under insolvency resolution.

September 25, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Once the resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, any outstanding claims, including those under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act for...

HC ruled that ex-parte tax assessment against a corporate debtor post-CIRP resolution plan approval is impermissible. The court held that once the NCLT approves a...

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice issued u/s 65 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for conducting an audit for the...

External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) Policy – ECB facility for Resolution Applicants under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Resolution professional doesn’t require nod of shareholders/members for insolvency resolution

The IBBI has issued a notification amending the Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Regulations, 2016, specifically modifying Schedule-I, Form H...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

NCLAT analyzed the procedural requirements for initiating insolvency resolution process for personal guarantors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal...

Fee payable to CA Firms, for Special Audits directed u/s 142(2A) - CA Firm registered as MSME - Recovery of fees due from the Income Tax Department invoking the...

Initiation of insolvency resolution of a personal guarantor of the Corporate debtors - The law doesn't envisage that the insolvency resolution of the personal guarantor...

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

HC ruled on the legality of creating additional dues by GST Department after NCLT's Resolution Plan approval. The court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved...

HC held that once a Resolution Plan is approved under IBC Section 31(1), only debts specified in the plan remain payable, binding on all authorities. Tax proceedings...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Quick Updates: