The High Court directed the respondents to process the ...

Refund applications under GST Act to be processed within a month, else provide reasons & opportunity of hearing.

September 30, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund applications filed u/s 54 of the Central/Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act within one month. If the respondents intend to reject the applications, they must provide reasons and afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before passing an order. The petition was disposed of based on the respondents' statement to comply with the court's directions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court directed the respondents to process the ...

Refund applications under GST Act to be processed within a month, else provide reasons & opportunity of hearing.

September 30, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Impugned communication rejecting application for input tax credit blocking lacked reasoning, amounting to non-application of mind and violation of natural justice...

Rejection of refund claim - opportunity of hearing not provided - As per Rule 92 (3) of CGST Rules, 2017, the provision is very clear that any application for refund...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

The HC disposed of the writ petitions, granting the petitioner liberty to file a rectification application under Section 161 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax...

The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

Claim of interest on delayed Refund - delay in grant of refund - relevant date to be computed from the date of application of refund or from the date of rectification of...

Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner denied opportunity of hearing before passing adverse order. Coordinate bench ruling in BHARAT MINT case affirmed -...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by the Special Director (Enforcement) due to inordinate and unexplained delay between the conclusion of...

Waiver of pre-deposit - Application for early hearing - Can there be any ground for early hearing to be granted when the appellants/counsel for appellants, have them...

HC quashed deficiency memo dated 21.02.2024 regarding CESS refund claim for AY 2017-18. Petitioner claimed clerical error in placing SGST figures in CESS column. While...

Retrospective Exemption and Refund: Section 135 of Finance Act, 2025 provides retrospective exemption from service tax for reinsurance services provided by insurance...

Cancellation of registration by adjudicating authority without assigning reasons and without application of mind violates principles of natural justice and Article 14 of...

Interest on delayed refund of IGST paid on export of the goods along with duty drawback - The refund of the petitioner was withheld for almost six months and after six...

Quick Updates: