Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in ...

Tax Demand Time-Barred as Order Issued Beyond Statutory Limits; Tribunal Upholds Assessee's Appeal for FY 2010-11.

November 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that Assessing Officer's order was time-barred. Scope of amendment to Section 201(3) was examined. For deductors filing TDS statement, limitation period of two years remained unchanged. For non-filing, it was extended from four to six years. Subsequently, uniform limitation of seven years was introduced prospectively from October 1, 2014. In the present case, for FY 2010-11, where statement was filed on May 13, 2011, the time limit for passing order u/s 201(1) was March 31, 2014. However, the Assessing Officer passed the order on March 28, 2018, beyond the prescribed time limit. Hence, the Appellate Tribunal rightly allowed the appeal, dismissing the revenue's appeal as the assessment was time-barred.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in ...

Tax Demand Time-Barred as Order Issued Beyond Statutory Limits; Tribunal Upholds Assessee's Appeal for FY 2010-11.

November 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

GST, a success of vast proportions, decreased tax incidence on common man, reduced compliance burden and logistics cost for trade and industry. Amendments facilitated...

HC upheld rejection of rectification application filed under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Following precedent set in Hongo India Pvt Ltd case, court...

Validity of SCN - SCN suffers from incurable deficiency - Demand raised solely on the basis of Income Tax data shared by the Income Tax authorities - CESTAT found that...

Limitation for passing a assessment order - Consequential order passed by the assessing authority beyond the time limit specified u/s 153 (2A) - The High Court examined...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013....

Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

The CESTAT dismissed the appellant's challenge to service tax levied on one-time premium collected for renting immovable property. Following the Allahabad HC decision in...

The respondent's request for conversion of shipping bills from NFEI to EOU/other schemes was made after a period of three months, exceeding the time limit. However, it...

Conversion of shipping bills from duty drawback scheme to advanced authorisation scheme - mistake in the shipping bills occurred - time limitation - The provision of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144C(4) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

The case pertains to the refund claims of service tax paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) due to a misconception or mistake of law. The tribunal held that...

Quick Updates: