Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years ...

Reassessment Notices Time-Barred; PCIT's Withdrawal of Approval Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Pending Proceedings.

November 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was invalid as there were no valid pending proceedings before the Assessing Officer. The second proviso to section 143(3), allowing the Assessing Officer to make a reference, was applicable only from assessment year 2022-23 onwards. The PCIT lacked jurisdiction, as the Commissioner (Exemption) with territorial jurisdiction should have approved or withdrawn the approval. The Appellate Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, quashing the PCIT's orders withdrawing approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to lack of jurisdiction and invalid reassessment proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years ...

Reassessment Notices Time-Barred; PCIT's Withdrawal of Approval Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Pending Proceedings.

November 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment - Approval of PCIT u/s 151 - The Tribunal acknowledged the Assessee's argument regarding the mechanical approval granted by the PCIT....

The High Court considered the validity of reopening an assessment based on excess funds not being part of an "approved refund" and thus subject to taxation. The Court...

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval...

The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

The ITAT Delhi held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as the JCIT granted approval mechanically without proper application of mind. The JCIT's...

Reassessment proceedings barred by limitation period u/s 149(1)(b) of Finance Act, 2021. Impugned notice u/s 148 dated 15.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 quashed. Consequential...

HC held that despite considering three block periods of limitation exclusion as per SC precedents, the re-assessment notice dated 23 July 2022 exceeded statutory...

Quick Updates: