Incriminating documents seized during search were routine ...

Partners' capital withdrawal after reorganization exempt from tax; routine records don't prove income suppression.

November 30, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Incriminating documents seized during search were routine business records, not evidence of income suppression. Assessment u/s 153A invalid when regular assessment completed. Supreme Court's Abhisar Buildwell judgment relied upon. No violation of Section 47(xiii) provisos found - partners withdrew capital after reorganization, not as consideration for transfer. Madras High Court's CADD Centre judgment supported exemption u/s 47(xiii). Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside orders treating firm's assets/liabilities as taxable long-term capital gains u/s 45(4), allowing assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Incriminating documents seized during search were routine ...

Partners' capital withdrawal after reorganization exempt from tax; routine records don't prove income suppression.

November 30, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Short term capital gain - capital gain arose from transfer of land to the partnership firm by way of capital contribution as the assets was converted to Fixed Capital...

Disallowance of remuneration paid to the partners of the assessee firm - Once the remuneration paid to the partners is in accordance of the provisions of Section...

Setting off the long term capital loss arising on sale of shares not subject to STT against long term capital gain arising from sale of Shares subjected to STT exempt...

Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act - capital introduced by the partner - the partner who introduced the capital has confirmed and owned the same – no addition - AT

Allowability of the interest paid to the partner by the assessee firm calculating on the opening balance of the capital account of the partner without considering the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - transactions in question were in the nature of partners’ capital withdrawal - As in the communication whereby the reasons recorded were...

Disallowance of interest expenditure - Corresponding to interest on debit balance of partner - amounts withdrawn by the partner for the payment of income-tax from the...

Reversal of the cenvat credit on capital goods when the final product manufactured by use of such capital goods became exempted subsequently - the capital goods were not...

Recovery of CENVAT Credit - capital goods - availability of credit when the production started become dutiable - even if the goods per se were exempted during the...

Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined...

Taxability in the hands of partners v/s firm - transfer of capital asset by firm to partners - There is no merit in the arguments advanced by assessee, that transfer of...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - cash received from partners - difference pointed out by the AO as capital introduced by both the partners of the assessee firm different...

The amount of advance given to partners and sister concerns is debited to the capital account of the partners, still there is a credit balance in the partners capital...

Unexplained capital contribution by partners – additions not confirmed - AT

Demand of service tax on partners services to partnership firm - separate identity - mutuality of services - there cannot be a service provider – service recipient...

Quick Updates: