The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision ...

Financial firm fails to maintain net worth, settlement rejected despite opportunities.

December 9, 2024

Case Laws SEBI HC

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner's documents were deficient, and it failed to maintain the required net worth for the financial years 2019-2021, despite being granted multiple opportunities for compliance. The court held that SEBI fairly considered the settlement proposal, provided ample opportunities, and no breach of natural justice occurred. The decision-making process was not arbitrary or defective. The court upheld SEBI's decision, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned communication rejecting the settlement applications due to the petitioner's persistent non-compliance.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision ...

Financial firm fails to maintain net worth, settlement rejected despite opportunities.

December 9, 2024

Case Laws SEBI HC

You may also like:

Corporate Social Responsibility - Determination of net worth - Company fall within the purview of section 135 of Companies Act or not - Exclusion of reserves created...

Professional Misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement Partner (EP) with Audit Firm - The NFRA refuted the firm’s claims that only the EP was accountable,...

Computation of net worth - inclusion of Deferred Tax Liability - Direct or Indirect Method of Calculation - Rejection of Petitioner’s bid in respect of a tender - The...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of estimation of income and rejection of duly audited books of accounts of the assessee firm u/s 145(3) of the Act. It held...

The High Court quashed the orders dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner firm on grounds of limitation and the order passed u/s 73(9) of the Central Goods and...

NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority erroneously extended the limitation period based on an arbitral award without a formal amendment to the Section 7 application....

Waiver of pre-deposit - tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of ₹ 1.14 crores - tribunal must consider the argument of net-worth for ascertaining...

Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

The firm is succeeded by the company, therefore, the cost of acquisition of the company would be as that of acquisition of the firm. The valuation of land and assets of...

HC upheld Settlement Commission's order accepting assessee's settlement amount under s.245D(4). Commission determined assessee lacked direct involvement in land...

ITAT upheld denial of registration under s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) and s.80G(5)(iii) where applicant society failed to furnish requisite documents despite three opportunities...

Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

Partnership firm dissolution, accounts settlement, and distribution of shares. Receiver appointed to manage assets until winding up. Defendants restrained from disposing...

The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

The company failed to file financial statements and annual returns for five financial years from 2014 to 2018. Despite having assets worth Rs. 3 crores as of 2008, the...

Quick Updates: