CESTAT adjudicated a customs broker's appeal challenging penalty ...

Customs Broker Wins Appeal: No Intentional Misconduct Found, Regulatory Violations Dismissed After Thorough Evidence Review

April 18, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT adjudicated a customs broker's appeal challenging penalty allegations for alleged regulatory violations. The tribunal found no intentional misconduct by the broker, noting the authorization letter from reconstituted firm's partners validating the broker's actions. The tribunal critically examined the documentary evidence and determined that the broker was unaware of the firm's constitutional changes and acted within authorized parameters. The department's allegations of violating Regulation 11(d) and 11(n) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations were deemed unsubstantiated. The tribunal conclusively held that no deliberate wrongdoing was established, thereby setting aside the penalty order and allowing the broker's appeal with full exoneration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT adjudicated a customs broker's appeal challenging penalty ...

Customs Broker Wins Appeal: No Intentional Misconduct Found, Regulatory Violations Dismissed After Thorough Evidence Review

April 18, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT adjudicated a customs broker (CB) case involving alleged regulatory violations related to export documentation. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, finding...

The HC set aside the order revoking the appellant's Customs Broker license and forfeiture of security deposit. It held there was no violation of Regulations 10(b),...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - It would not be unreasonable to assume that if the shipping bill is filed by Customs Broker X and the person representing the...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Customs broker licence revocation - importer engaged appellant to file import bill of entry but appellant used another broker's credentials instead of its own - imported...

CESTAT held that penalty under Regulation 18 of CBLR 2013 requires establishing violations under grounds (a), (b), or (c) through documentary evidence. While the...

The CESTAT Kolkata, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a Customs Broker accused of illegal activities leading to the forfeiture of their security deposit...

HC upheld CESTAT's decision against cancellation of customs broker license. While KYC documents were submitted, the Department alleged unexplained procurement methods...

The case involves the revocation of a Customs Broker License due to the licensee's involvement in fraudulent export activities for wrongful IGST refund claims. The...

Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

CESTAT held that the customs broker fulfilled verification obligations under Regulation 10(n) by validating IEC and GSTIN through online portals and official documents....

Levy of Penalty on Customs Broker - pre-condition to restore the license - The case revolves around a Customs Broker who handled the clearance of household goods without...

Revocation of customs broker license challenged due to lack of specific allegations in show cause notice regarding violations of Regulations 11(n) and 17(9) of 2013...

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker under Section 132 read with Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 - a Customs House Agent or a Customs Broker cannot be fastened with...

Revocation of suspension of the Customs Broker Licence - The broker was initially accused of failing to advise proper classification of imported goods. However, the...

Quick Updates: