Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2025 Year 2025 This

ITAT held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacks jurisdiction to ...


Reopening Tax Assessment Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Generic Reporting, Tribunal Strikes Down Arbitrary Reassessment Under Section 147

April 18, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

ITAT held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacks jurisdiction to reopen assessment under section 147. The AO failed to establish a genuine reason to believe income escaped assessment, merely relying on Investigation Wing's report without independent verification. The reasons recorded were generic, mechanical, and lacked substantive evidence of material facts not previously disclosed. The tribunal found no tangible material supporting the AO's belief, emphasizing that receipt of information alone is insufficient to trigger reassessment proceedings. Consequently, the notice under section 148 was quashed, and consequent reassessment proceedings were set aside, decisively ruling in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  2. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

  3. The case involves the validity of assessments u/s 153A and 132 of the Income Tax Act. In the absence of incriminating material seized during the search, assessments...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non independent application of mind by AO - Scope of borrowed satisfaction - The Appellate Tribunal found that the reopening was solely...

  5. Reopening of assessment on the basis of Volckar committee report to be annulled - AT

  6. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside service tax demands predicated solely on Form 26AS without substantive evidence of service provision. The tribunal consistently...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening on the basis of the audit objections - the reasons for reopening of the assessment are almost identically worded as that of...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

  9. HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

  10. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

  11. The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

  12. For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

  14. Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

  15. HC held that the assessment reopening under SS147 was procedurally flawed. The AO failed to substantiate allegations of income escape by thoroughly examining disputed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates