HC dismissed petitioner's application under Section 161 of Goods ...

Legal Challenge Rejected: Section 161 GST Application Dismissed Due to Lack of Substantive Grounds and No Adverse Impact

April 18, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC dismissed petitioner's application under Section 161 of Goods and Services Act, 2017, holding that principles of natural justice are not mandatory when no actual rectification is performed and the applicant suffers no adverse impact. The court determined that the rectification provision requires adherence to natural justice only when specific conditions are met: (i) rectification is being carried out and (ii) such rectification potentially adversely affects the assessee. In this instance, the application was deemed vague and without substantive grounds, thus justifying rejection without a personal hearing.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC dismissed petitioner's application under Section 161 of Goods ...

Legal Challenge Rejected: Section 161 GST Application Dismissed Due to Lack of Substantive Grounds and No Adverse Impact

April 18, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a voluntary GST cancellation application. The court found the original order defective due to lack of reasoned...

The HC dismissed a writ application challenging seizure of goods and vehicle due to fatal procedural defects in the supporting affidavit. The deponent, Gopal Yadav,...

Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect challenged. Court held that authorities failed to provide substantive reasons for rejecting application and...

HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding retrospective cancellation....

HC allowed the petition challenging the refund claim rejection. The court found that the respondent improperly rejected the refund application in GST RFD-03 by stating...

The key points covered in the legal document are: 1. It introduces new forms (GST SPL-01 to GST SPL-08) for taxpayers to apply for waiver of interest and penalty u/s...

SC held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC due to absence of cause of action. An agreement to sell does not confer substantive...

NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor's account during moratorium period under Section 14 of...

Petition maintainability hinges on alternative remedy availability. Excess tax refund due to ignorance and legal ambiguity. Supreme Court ruled that purely legal...

The High Court held that GST Authorities cannot launch prosecution invoking penal provisions under the Indian Penal Code without invoking penal provisions of the GST...

AAR determined that the advance ruling application by the contractor regarding GST rate reimbursement was inadmissible. The ruling authority found the tax liability...

HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax recovery proceedings. The petition contested the validity of recovery notice issued on 13.02.2025 for tax, interest, and...

The Adjudicating Authority erred by dismissing the Section 95 application without appointing a Resolution Professional and following the statutory process under the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered several issues: 1. Addition against undisclosed income from bank accounts. Assessee's funds routed through bank accounts of others....

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Quick Updates: