ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding depreciation claim on ...

Intangible Asset Depreciation Claim Upheld: Reasonable Approach Validates Tax Assessment Under Section 263

May 2, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding depreciation claim on intangible assets. The tribunal held that the assessee's depreciation claim on intangible assets under development was legally sustainable. The court emphasized that not every revenue loss constitutes prejudice to revenue interests. Citing SC precedents, the tribunal confirmed that when an AO adopts a permissible approach and takes a reasonable view, the assessment cannot be considered erroneous. The tribunal quashed the CIT's order under Section 263, ruling that the depreciation claim on goodwill was allowable and did not cause revenue prejudice. Consequently, the assessee's appeal grounds were fully allowed, maintaining the original depreciation claim.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding depreciation claim on ...

Intangible Asset Depreciation Claim Upheld: Reasonable Approach Validates Tax Assessment Under Section 263

May 2, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Claim of depreciation - Bifurcation of slump price into the value of tangible assets and intangible assets - Ultimately after the slump price has been attributed first...

ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving surface rights and intangible asset depreciation claims. The tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting...

Depreciation on the value of the building as revalued prior to conversion of the erstwhile partnership firm into a private limited company - the prerequisite for...

Disallowance of the claim of depreciation on intangible asset - amalgamation scheme initiated - when there is no transfer of the asset as well as there is no valuation...

Rate of depreciation on intangible asset of licence for running container trains - commercial rights for 20 years - such rights would amount to capital asset - claim of...

Non compete right is an "intangible asset" eligible for depreciation - AT

Eligibility for depreciation in respect of the intangible asset by way of trademark allowed - AT

Depreciation on intangible asset disallowed - Customer Base, Material Suppliers, Technical Manpower,Technology and Patents - AO directed to allow depreciation on the WDV...

Depreciation on intangible assets - assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on 'business information' under the category of 'other identifiable intangibles [goodwill].... - AT

Claim of Depreciation on the brands used by assessee - intangible assets - A careful perusal of clause (b) of Explanation 3 extracted hereinabove shows that the...

Disallowance of depreciation - Addition towards Film Software Library as the same is not intangible asset and it is to be treated as Plant & Machinery - depreciation @...

Depreciation on intangibles - sale as slump sale - All these intangible assets transferred to the assessee have a commercial value - assessee is eligible to claim...

Allowability of depreciation intangible rights/assets - company had purchased Imidachlorpid business on slump sale from a company which is not a related concern u/s...

Disallowance of depreciation u/s 32 - intangible assets - amount paid for non compete fees - non compete fee is not an eligible intangible asset as the words “similar...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a...

Quick Updates: