CESTAT appellate proceedings concerning attempted export of ...

Peacock Feather Export Case: Insufficient Evidence Leads to Appellant's Exoneration Under Customs Act Section 114(i)

May 7, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT appellate proceedings concerning attempted export of prohibited peacock feathers involved allegations against an appellant for misrepresenting goods as 'carpets'. The tribunal found procedural irregularities in evidence collection, specifically improper reliance on statements under Section 108 of Customs Act without proper witness examination and cross-examination. The commissioner's order imposing a penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 was deemed unsustainable due to insufficient direct evidence linking the appellant to the alleged export conspiracy. Mere presence at the premises with the principal accused was deemed inadequate to establish culpability. The tribunal allowed the appeal, effectively setting aside the penalty order and exonerating the appellant from liability under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT appellate proceedings concerning attempted export of ...

Peacock Feather Export Case: Insufficient Evidence Leads to Appellant's Exoneration Under Customs Act Section 114(i)

May 7, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Confiscation of export of prohibited goods - A plain reading of section 113(d) shows that ‘any goods attempted to be exported or brought within the limits of any customs...

The Policy Circular No. 01/2024 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade provides clarification on the discharge of export obligations of Advance Authorisation...

Illegal export of Peacock Feathers, prohibited goods - seeking waiver of penalty - OIO is silent as to whether another attempt was made to serve the notice or not. -...

The Principal Commissioner of Customs at Visakhapatnam discontinued the practice of routine sampling and testing of rice export consignments before issuing Let Export...

The CESTAT Allahabad held that in a case involving illegal exports of non-basmati rice to Nepal, there was a lack of evidence to prove the illegal export. The tribunal...

Revocation of CB license - first time export goods -The appellants CB in this case cannot be held responsible in cases where they have verified the identity of the...

The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged...

Penalty of penalty for abetment of the fraudulent export scheme - The appellant was accused of misdeclaration and fraudulent export of ready-made garments in order to...

Rebate claim for refund of service tax rejected - Export of consignment of garnets extracted from illegally mined sea sand - Export incentives not granted for proceeds...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - The IEC forms the foundation for the entire system of controls and, in turn, is the basis for issue of various licences and scrips...

Smuggling - burden to prove - invocation of Section 123 - the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 made before the customs officers is not a...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

Duty Drawback - petitioner is unable to produce export realization within 6 months from the date of export - In case export proceeds are realized within extended period,...

Whether the provisions of sections 113(d) and 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 are invocable in the case of export under Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) scheme or not - ...

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged submission of false export documents. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate charges of abetment or...

Quick Updates: