SC resolves apparent conflict between precedents regarding ...

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Challenges in Arbitration: Section 34 Interpretation Resolves Precedent Conflicts

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

SC resolves apparent conflict between precedents regarding jurisdictional challenges in arbitration proceedings under the Act, 1996. The Court held that while a plea of lack of jurisdiction can generally be raised for the first time under Section 34, an exception exists for cases involving the MP Act, 1983. Where no jurisdictional objection was raised before the arbitral tribunal and an award has been passed, the award cannot be annulled solely on jurisdictional grounds. The Court clarified that Lion Engineering and L.G. Chaudhary (II) decisions are not contradictory but complementary, with L.G. Chaudhary (II) creating a specific limitation on challenging awards. The High Court's judgment was set aside, emphasizing the need to interpret arbitration laws harmoniously.

View Source

← Previous Next →

SC resolves apparent conflict between precedents regarding ...

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Challenges in Arbitration: Section 34 Interpretation Resolves Precedent Conflicts

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

HC dismissed petition challenging prosecution for smuggling foreign-made cigarettes disguised as electronic goods. The court held that the Additional Director General...

Challenge to the recovery notices without challenging the order-in-original - service tax was collected but not paid - the petitioner cannot challenge the consequential order - HC

HC analyzed the interpretation of "nearest Magistrate" in money laundering arrest procedures. The court held that production before the jurisdictional Magistrate within...

Writ petition challenging assessment order u/s 147 dismissed. Court held that once assessee has availed alternate remedy of filing appeal, appellate authority bound by...

HC held that notices under s.148 issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer remain valid despite faceless assessment requirements, as traditional and faceless mechanisms...

HC ruled on a GST-related Show Cause Notice (SCN) involving jurisdictional and procedural issues. The court granted a singular opportunity for the petitioner to correct...

HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice, finding no procedural irregularity in the transfer of case from faceless to jurisdictional Assessing...

The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee's (SCC) actual...

Transfer of case u/s 127 - centralization of case after search - delayed challenge to the order passed u/s 153A - the impugned order came to be passed on 19.02.2019 and...

Challenge of jurisdiction u/s.120(4)(b) - If challenge to the jurisdiction has not been made within the prescribed time u/s.124(3) to the authority, whose jurisdiction...

HC dismissed the petition challenging a tax reopening notice, finding no prima facie jurisdictional error. The court noted the absence of a direct constitutional...

HC upheld tax reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-2010, finding valid jurisdictional grounds for reopening assessment. The court determined that information about bogus...

Exemption from Pre-deposit - The petitioner argued that their request for exemption from pre-deposit was wrongly rejected, and they challenged the jurisdiction of...

Cargo Handling services - coal handling system - here a conflict of decisions among High Courts does not relate to interpretation of statutory provisions or a...

AO's jurisdiction was challenged regarding notice u/s 143(2) after territorial reassignment. ITAT determined that jurisdictional challenges fall under Part B, Chapter...

Quick Updates: