HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to the rejected settlement ...

Legal Challenge Succeeds: Dispute Settlement Allowed Despite Loss Carry Forward Limitations Under Finance Act Provisions

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to the rejected settlement under the DTVSV Scheme. The court held that the dispute falls within the scope of the Finance Act provisions, and the designated authority's rejection was erroneous. The key reasoning emphasized that an assessee's entitlement to carry forward losses for a specific assessment year is distinct from claiming those losses in subsequent years. The court found that the petitioner's inability to claim carry forward loss in AY 2023-24 does not preclude settlement of the dispute for AY 2022-23. Consequently, the court directed reconsideration of the settlement application under Rule 9(1) of the DTVSV Rules.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to the rejected settlement ...

Legal Challenge Succeeds: Dispute Settlement Allowed Despite Loss Carry Forward Limitations Under Finance Act Provisions

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Relief to start-ups in carrying forward and setting off of losses - Relaxation in 51% holding of shares for the purpose of carry forward of losses of eligible star-up...

Denial of carry forward of long term capital loss - When the he taxed the difference in amount under short term capital gain and also disallowed short term capital loss...

Determining the business loss by allowing carried forward loss - return is filed beyond the due date prescribed u/s 139(1) - AO has correctly held that business loss is...

ITAT adjudicated a dispute regarding carry forward of Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) for a Singapore-incorporated company. The tribunal examined the computation of...

Carry forward of losses u/s 73 - Speculative loss - Derivative transaction - Tribunal erred in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to carry forward its losses - HC

Disallowance of setting off of the carried forward loss - return filed beyond the due date specified under subsection (1) of section 139 - It was argued that the delay...

Disallowing the loss u/s 79 - change in shareholding of the assessee company - any loss that is coming from the assessment year 2013-14 is not allowable against the...

Regarding long-term capital gain determination, indexed cost of acquisition claimed by assessee at Rs. 45 lakhs for property valued over Rs. 45 lakhs, evidenced by...

CIRP - Carry forward of losses - The benefit of carry forward of losses can be availed by the Appellant subject of opportunity to be given to Income Tax Authority to...

Disallowance u/s 14A - Carry forward of business loss – setting off carry forward business losses now depends on the finality of the addition made by Assessing Officer...

Carry forward of unabsorbed long term capital loss - As the claim of the assessee is in accordance with the scheme of the Act viz. firstly allowing relief u/s.54EC while...

B/F losses not allowed to be carry forward - There is, in our opinion, no practical efficacy in the assessee carrying forward business losses, unabsorbed depreciation,...

Change in constitution of firm or on succession – Restriction to carry forward losses - Unabsorbed depreciation is carried forward u/s 32(2) and are not brought forward...

Incorrect set off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation - The working of the Ld. AO contains the mistakes as they are not in consonance with the...

The assessee failed to claim the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit in the original income tax return and did not file a revised return. The Assessing Officer (AO) did...

Quick Updates: