NCLAT held that the insolvency application's threshold must be ...

Insolvency Threshold Determined by Original Filing Amount, Not Subsequent Partial Payments Under Section 9

May 23, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

NCLAT held that the insolvency application's threshold must be assessed at the time of filing, not subsequent deposit. Despite respondent's partial payment reducing the outstanding amount below Rs. 1 Cr during proceedings, the original filing amount of Rs. 1,16,25,583/- remains determinative. The Tribunal's dismissal was deemed a patent error, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with legal principles. The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the original tribunal to reconsider the Section 9 application based on the threshold existing at the time of initial filing.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NCLAT held that the insolvency application's threshold must be ...

Insolvency Threshold Determined by Original Filing Amount, Not Subsequent Partial Payments Under Section 9

May 23, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

NCLAT determined the threshold limit for filing an insolvency application against a Personal Guarantor under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority for...

The CBDT extended the due date for determining the amount payable under column (3) of the Table in section 90 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 from 31st...

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has extended the deadline for liquidators to file forms related to liquidation and voluntary liquidation processes...

Cut-off Time for Determining Minimum Threshold of Margins to be Collected from Clients

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a Section 9 insolvency application. The Tribunal held that individual operational creditors' claims must exceed...

Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of...

HC invalidated the tax recovery action against the petitioner, finding the assessment order withdrawn under Section 62(2) as a matter of legal fiction. The court...

HC allowed the appeal, finding the filing procedurally valid despite delay in certified copy submission. The court determined that online filing with electronic...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

NCLAT rejected appellants' challenge to IBC Section 7 application for corporate insolvency resolution. The tribunal found appellants were direct borrowers, not...

Delay in filing of appeal or not - appeal rejected on the ground of being filed much after a period of 60 + 30 days from the date of receipt of the Order-in-Original -...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor's Section 9 Application rejection. The tribunal found a pre-existing dispute...

Petition maintainable despite previously filed appeal. Order passed in violation of principles of natural justice by not allowing petitioner to file reply within...

Set off of brought forward loss - Removal of defects in the original return - determination of date of filing of ITR - Once the defects in the original return of income...

Quick Updates: