Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (3) TMI 678 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......necessary. The same view was reiterated in another communication. 1992 (61) E.L.T. 14 5. emsp In the present case the goods were components for further manufacture and were therefore covered by the trade notice. No permission was required to be taken. The penalty imposed and upheld does not survive. The appeal is allowed with consequential benefit.
|