Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (3) TMI 454 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......short and the respondent at the spot gave an explanation that this is due to weighment error and visible/invisible wastage during the period of time. There is no evidence on record to show that the respondent removed inputs from the factory, I find no infirmity in the impugned order, the appeals are rejected. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court)
|