Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (2) TMI 736 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......therefore hold that the demand is not barred by limitation. Since the assessees clearly stated that they are not challenging the demand on merits, it is required to be sustained. Levy of interest and imposition of penalty is also therefore sustainable. 6. emsp In the result, we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal. (Pronounced in court.)
|