Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password

 

2008 (7) TMI 788 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the respondent regarding cartage charges recovered from customers. The charges were for unloading and not part of assessable value. The Revenue's appeal was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting their contention. (2008 (7) TMI 788 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD)

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Firm faces GST reversal demand after cement supplier's insolvency desp...
F: Windmill operators can claim proportionate Input Tax Credit under GST ...
F: Taxpayer cites Gujarat High Court GST ruling but faces rejection due t...
H: Auto-Populated Inter-State Supply Data in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 deferred. ...
H: Central Government Notifies 2.70-Hectare SEZ for IT/ITES Under SEZ Act...
H: Cancellation of GST Registration for Non-Filing Returns Valid Under Se...
H: HC refuses to quash show cause notice under Section 74 CGST Act, allow...
H: Appellate Authority Can Admit Additional Evidence Under Rule 112(4) of...
H: Writ Petition Dismissed for Challenging ITC Reversal Under Sections 16...
H: Writ Petition Dismissed for Fraudulent ITC Claim Using Fictitious Invo...
H: Restriction on ITC Transfer Post-Merger Under Section 18(3) CGST Act N...
H: Writ Petition Dismissed; Appeal Allowed with 25% Tax Deposit Under Rel...
H: GST exemption granted for NSQF-aligned training under SI No. 69, exclu...
H: 102 Government-Approved Education Courses Classified Under SAC 999294 ...
H: Fresh Water Tank and Effluent Pond Classified as Plant and Machinery f...
H: Rooftop Solar Plant Qualifies as Capital Goods for ITC Under Section 1...
H: Rehabilitation Services Not Exempt Under Entry 74A Without Clinical Es...
H: Marine Engines and Spares for Fishing Vessels Attract 5% GST Under Ser...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 introduces Schedule-XIII replacing Schedule 11 wi...
F: Taxpayer must reverse ITC balance when switching from regular to compo...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XII mirrors 1961 Act's mineral list for ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XI modernizes provident fund regulations...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XIV preserves existing insurance taxatio...
T: Government gets 3-year power under Clause 535 to resolve Income Tax Bi...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 536 repeals 1961 Act with comprehensive tr...
A: ITC can be cross-utilized across unrelated business supplies without r...
A: CGST Section 50(1) Advisory on Interest Payment Valid as Preliminary N...
A: School bus operator must pay GST when parents pay directly instead of ...
A: Legal Metrology Rules 2011 mandate labeling requirements for packaged ...
A: Directors and managers face personal liability under Section 49 for co...