Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password

 

2012 (4) TMI 739 - AT - Central Excise

  1. 2018 (2) TMI 541 - AT
The appellate tribunal CESTAT Mumbai dismissed a stay petition due to non-prosecution by the applicant. The applicants were directed to deposit the dues as per the adjudication order within four weeks and report compliance by a specified date.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: GST practitioner debates whether Gujarat High Court GSTR-3B interest r...
F: Windmill expenses qualify for proportionate Input Tax Credit under Rul...
F: Second-hand truck dealers can pay GST on profit margin under Rule 32(5...
F: Consolidated GST notices spanning multiple years face legal challenges...
F: Business owner with Rajasthan GST registration faces conflicting advic...
H: Clause 445 imposes strict penalties on non-profits diverting income to...
H: Clause 444 imposes strict penalties for false accounting entries to pr...
H: Clause 441 imposes INR 25,000 penalty for failure to maintain tax reco...
H: Clause 443 updates penalty rules for undisclosed income with a 10% tax...
H: Clause 442 imposes penalties for inaccurate or missing documentation i...
H: Clause 441 imposes fixed INR 25,000 penalty for failure to maintain bo...
H: Clause 440 of Income Tax Bill 2025 sets immunity rules for timely tax ...
H: Clause 439 Income Tax Bill 2025 sets formula-based penalties for under...
H: Identical Mineral Lists in Income Tax Act 1961 and 2025 Bill Support T...
H: Income Tax Bill 2025's Schedule-XIII updates exclusions on luxury and ...
H: Parliamentary Committee Reviews Income Tax Bill 2025 Simplifying Tax C...
F: Firm faces GST reversal demand after cement supplier's insolvency desp...
H: Auto-Populated Inter-State Supply Data in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 deferred. ...
H: Central Government Notifies 2.70-Hectare SEZ for IT/ITES Under SEZ Act...
H: Cancellation of GST Registration for Non-Filing Returns Valid Under Se...
H: HC refuses to quash show cause notice under Section 74 CGST Act, allow...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XI modernizes provident fund regulations...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XIV preserves existing insurance taxatio...
T: Government gets 3-year power under Clause 535 to resolve Income Tax Bi...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 536 repeals 1961 Act with comprehensive tr...
A: ITC can be cross-utilized across unrelated business supplies without r...
A: CGST Section 50(1) Advisory on Interest Payment Valid as Preliminary N...
A: School bus operator must pay GST when parents pay directly instead of ...
A: Legal Metrology Rules 2011 mandate labeling requirements for packaged ...
A: Directors and managers face personal liability under Section 49 for co...