Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2010 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (10) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALOREAppeal to Appellate Tribunal - Restoration - Appeals, which were dismissed for non-compliance - Submission that the challans, which indicate the payment of pre-deposit, does not indicate the name of the current applicants but, indicates the name of the assessee as Handum Industries Ltd., the main appellant - The applicants are Managing Director/employees of the main appellant and there is no reason for taking any objection for deposit by the company against the said employees - As regards the deposit made on behalf of other company ,find that it could be possible that M/s. Handum Industries Ltd., in order to prosecute the appeal filed by other company, had paid the amount on their behalf - Find that though the pre-deposit ordered was deposited after considerable time, in any case, there is a compliance of the order of pre-deposit of the amounts - Hence, applications for restoration of appeals need to be allowed.
|