2010 (10) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - All these four applications are made by the applicants for restoration of their appeals, which were dismissed for non-compliance, by Final Order Nos. 615-622 dated 1-3-2010. 2. The learned Counsel submits that vide Stay Order Nos. 1782 to 1789/2009 dated 17-12-2009, these four appellants were directed to deposit 10% of the amoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s her submission that the applicants herein did not move High Court for relief. It is also her submission that the challans, which indicate the payment of pre-deposit, does not indicate the name of the current applicants but, indicates the name of the assessee as Handum Industries Ltd., the main appellant. It is her submission that the amounts deposited by the main appellant should be considered a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... find that though the pre-deposit ordered was deposited  after considerable time, in any case, there is a compliance of the order of pre-deposit of the amounts. In view of this, we are of the considered opinion that all these four applications for restoration of appeals need to be allowed and are  allowed and the appeals are restored to their original numbers. Registry to list these appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X