Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2013 (6) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (6) TMI 58 - DELHI HIGH COURTStay - whether the Tribunal fell into error in holding that the failure to deposit an amount directed automatically resulted in adverse condition as far as appellants are concerned, disentitling them to make their contentions on merits? - held that:- without first dealing with the merits of the individual appellant’s case for stay, the Tribunal ought not to have mechanically assumed default and dismissed the appeal. - This Court in previous order [2013 (5) TMI 700 - DELHI HIGH COURT] and the connected matters dealt with the case other than the present one i.e. Ravi Singhal, Supreme Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. and Supreme Trading Co. and observed that this approach of the Tribunal is indefensible. Matter restored before CESTAT for rehearing.
|