Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2015 (2) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (2) TMI 75 - HC - Money LaunderingAttachment of certain immovable properties - Single Judge held that continued attachment of the property was unsustainable - Held that:- Single Judge in the impugned order has returned categorical findings on interpretation of the provisions of the Act. It is also argued that in other petitions entailing the same question coming up before the learned Single Judge, the learned Single Judge is proceeding on the premise that the findings returned in the impugned order are final. - interpretation adopted by the learned Single Judge of the provisions of the Act, is erroneous and that though the learned Single Judge has taken note of the contention of the appellant of the amendment of the year 2013 to Section 8 thereof but has not adjudicated on the said aspect. - senior counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner agrees that the impugned order be set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondent / writ petitioner as well as this appeal be disposed of by directing the Appellate Authority under the PMLA to decide the appeal already preferred by the respondent / writ petitioner against the order aforesaid of attachment of properties within the time to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal by setting aside the impugned order / judgment and by disposing of the writ petition (from which this appeal arises) filed by the respondent / writ petitioner by directing the Appellate Authority under PMLA to dispose of the appeal preferred by the respondent / writ petitioner against the order of attachment within a period of eight weeks - Appeal disposed of.
|